![]() |
Dear Doctors/Scientists think before 'following orders'. |
The 10 Commandments of The Nuremberg Code:
- The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is
a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
- The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
- The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results justify the performance of the experiment.
- The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
- No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
- The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
- Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death.
- The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
- During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
- During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is like to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
t - Taken from British Medical Journal No 7070, Vol 313, 7 Dec 1996.
The above Code makes it clear that the doctors and other health care professionals which would claim innocence of the adverse effects of the Covid-19 vaccinations would not be let off the hook, if Nuremberg Code was to be implemented anytime in future. It is personal responsibility of the doctor or the health care provider when he/she tells the patient 'its safe and effective' before injecting the experimental Covid-19 inoculations into the test subjects.
Furthermore, by repeatedly parroting the lie 'its not experimental', the health care professionals are committing a grave crime against humanity. The test subjects never have a chance for informed consent when the experimental nature of the vaccines itself is denied. They were enrolled into the experimentation without their knowledge. Also the private businesses, offices and educational institutions who are coercing the people into entering the mass experimentation will also be accountable if this Code were to be implemented in the future. The Risk/Benefit balance is way out of proportion with risks outweighing the benefits exponentially. These experimental vaccines neither stop transmission nor infection so the benefit is meagre when compared to the risks of blood clots, bleeding, heart inflammation, neurological problems, pregnancy loss and infertility issues it carries along. Its a known fact that any drug or vaccine is studied for at least around 2 years before rejecting or accepting its causal relationship with an adverse effect. How can you (medical community) follow the dictations from health agencies (under big pharma payroll) and declare to the patient "There is no evidence that vaccine has caused the heart attack." Where is your conscience? Where is your common sense? Don't you see an observational relationship between increased heart and blood related issues in the vaccinated people?
We find that the Covid-19 experimental vaccine testing program breaks every single point in the Nuremberg Code. Right now entire world governments seem to be involved in this scam. Those who did not agree to be part of this crime died in suspicious circumstances (assassinated?) But a day might come when all these crimes against humanity would be dug out and the culprits be brought to justice. The day when Nuremberg Code would be implemented and punishments would be publicly carried out- like it happened with the Nazi scientists and doctors. So, dear health care professionals, if not for your conscience or moral calling, at least for the sake of law and for the fear of punishment in the future, stop being agents of this mass experimentation.
Comments
Post a Comment